Approach to a Anterior Hip Replacement Scar


  • The anterior approach accesses the hip from the front, typically through a 6–8 cm incision along the natural hip crease.
  • Because it works between the muscles rather than cutting through them, it is described as muscle-sparing.
  • Scar size and appearance vary between patients and depend on individual healing, not just the surgical approach.
  • The anterior approach is not simply “better” than the posterior approach; the right choice depends on your individual anatomy and circumstances.

If you’re considering an anterior hip replacement, the scar is often one of the practical things people wonder about: where it sits, how big it is, and how it heals. The anterior approach has some particular characteristics when it comes to scarring, though the right surgical approach for you depends on much more than the scar alone.

The Anterior Approach and Its Scar

In anterior hip replacement, the joint is accessed from the front of the hip, typically through an incision in the region of 6–8 cm (this varies between patients and surgeons). Because the approach works between the muscles rather than cutting through them, it is described as muscle-sparing.

Characteristics of the Anterior Scar

Several features of the anterior approach relate to the scar and the surrounding tissue:

  • Position. The scar sits along the natural crease at the front of the hip, which can make it less noticeable and easily covered by clothing.
  • Size. The incision is generally 6–8 cm in length, though the exact size varies with the individual and the specifics of the operation.
  • Muscle preservation. Working between the muscles rather than cutting through them can mean less muscle trauma, which for some patients is associated with less early post-operative discomfort and a more natural contour of the hip.

It’s worth remembering that scar appearance also depends on individual factors such as how your skin heals, so results vary from person to person.

How the Approach Supports Recovery

Beyond the scar itself, the anterior approach has some practical recovery features. Because the incision is at the front, many patients find it comfortable to sit, bend, drive, and lie on their side during recovery without pressure directly on the wound. Imaging such as X-ray guidance may also be used during the operation to help position the components accurately.

Anterior vs Posterior: A Genuine Choice

It’s important to be balanced here: the anterior approach is not simply “better” than the traditional posterior approach; they are different techniques, each with advantages and considerations.

AspectAnterior ApproachPosterior Approach
Incision positionFront of the hip, along the natural crease.Back or side of the hip.
Muscle involvementMuscle-sparing; works between muscle planes.A traditional, well-established technique.
Considered whenMay suit many patients, particularly for scar and early comfort.Reliable and versatile, and remains the more appropriate choice for some patients depending on anatomy.

The anterior approach offers the scar and muscle-sparing features described above and may suit many patients, but the posterior approach is reliable, versatile, and remains the more appropriate choice for some people depending on their anatomy and circumstances. The OrthoInfo overview of minimally invasive hip replacement approaches provides further general background on how these techniques compare.

The most suitable approach for you is a decision to make with your surgeon, based on your individual situation, not on the scar alone. The priority is always a safe, successful outcome and good long-term function. To discuss which approach may suit you, arrange a consultation.

Frequently Asked Questions

How big is the scar from an anterior hip replacement?

The incision is often in the region of 6–8 cm, though this varies with the individual and the specifics of the surgery. Because it follows the natural crease at the front of the hip, the scar is often relatively discreet.

Is the anterior scar less noticeable than a posterior one?

The anterior scar sits along the front of the hip which many people find easy to conceal. However, scar appearance depends on individual healing, and the choice of approach should be based on what is clinically best for you rather than the scar alone.

Is the anterior approach always the best option?

No. The anterior approach has real advantages for some patients, but the posterior approach is reliable and more suitable for others depending on their anatomy and circumstances. The right approach is an individual decision made with your surgeon.

Medical Disclaimer: The information on this page is intended as general patient education and does not constitute medical advice. Surgical approaches, incision sizes, and scar outcomes vary between patients, and the best approach for you depends on your individual circumstances. Please discuss your options with your own surgeon.


David Slattery, FRACS MBBS (Hons) LLB FAOrthA
Dr David Slattery is an orthopaedic surgeon with over 10 years of experience, with a special focus on hip and knee joint preservation and replacement. With qualifications in both medicine and law, he brings a unique and comprehensive approach to patient care. His surgical techniques are minimally invasive and evidence-based, designed to reduce pain and enhance recovery. Trained in leading institutions across Europe and the USA, Dr Slattery offers advanced treatments for a wide range of joint conditions. He is deeply committed to patient outcomes and takes pride in tailoring treatment plans to each individual. Whether you’re an athlete or seeking relief from chronic joint pain, his goal is to restore function and improve your quality of life.